|
ZABEEHA
Almighty Allah
Ta’ala in His infinite mercy has made certain animals Halaal
(permissible) for this Ummah. We are required to be thankful
to Him by following the dictates of the Qur’aan and Sunnah
by ensuring that His name is taken upon slaughtering of the
animal. Allah Ta’ala states in the noble Qur’aan:
1.
‘For every nation We have specified a rite (for
slaughtering) so that they may take the name of Allah
Ta’ala upon (the slaughter of) the animals granted to them
as sustenance.’ (Hajj 34)
2. And
consume not of that whereupon the name of Allah Ta’ala was
omitted (at the time of slaughter). Indeed it is a
transgression. Verily the Shayaateen inspire their friends
to cause division with you. If you obey them, you are indeed
Mushriks (ascribing partners to Allah).’ (An`aam 122)
3.
‘So take the name of Allah upon them (at the time
of slaughter) while they stand in rows.’ (Hajj 36). In
reference to Camels which are slaughtered by Nahr (a swift
stab of the neck which severes the four arteries) while
standing.
4.
‘… and such animals upon which they mention not
the name of Allah only to fabricate a lie against him.’ (An’aam
138)
5.
Forbidden to you are Maytah (carrion), flowing blood,
the flesh of swine and that slaughtered for other than Allah
as well as the (animal) expiring by strangulation, illness
or pain, falling (from a height), by a wound (sustained
through fighting) and by falling to a predator and (about to
be consumed), excepting those (animals) upon which you
effect Zaka (Shar’ee slaugher). (Maaidah 3)
From the above
Aayaats, the following points are understood:
1.
Meat is not in the same category as other nutrients.
2.
The most important condition is that Tasmiyah (taking
the name of Allah) be pronounced at the time of slaughter. The
Aayaats clearly explain the impermissibility of those animals
whose slaughter was not preceded by Tasmiya.
3.
The impermissibility of those animals whose lives were
ended by means other than Zabah (Shar’ee slaughter) of which
Tasmiya is a condition. All such animals are Maytah (carrion)
and are expressly forbidden.
4.
The Dhabeeha (animal slaughtered) by a Kaafir
(non-believer) or Mushrik (polytheist) is Haraam (unlawful).
However, those Ahlul Kitaab (people of the book) who also hold
the Aqeedah (belief) of Tasmiya at the time of slaughter have
been excluded from the Kuffaar majority.
5.
The Aayaat number 122 of An`aam explains consumption of
meat not slaughtered with Tasmiyah as Fisq – transgression
and disobedience. The Aayat then explains that to regard consumption of such
meat as Halaal is nothing but a teaching of Shaytaan to cause
division among the Ummah. The Aayat also warns that obedience
of Shaytaan in this matter is a kin to Shirk (ascribing
partners to Allah).
Imaam Bukhari has
quoted this same Aayat in his magnum opus under the chapter,
‘Intentional Ommission of the Tasmiyah at the time of
Slaughter’ to the same import as explained by Hafiz ibn
Hajar, the renowned commentator of Sahih Bukhari in the
following words:
Imaam Bukhari
(RA) wishes to point out by citing this Aayat the reproach
against using this Aayah as proof to legalise omission of
Tasmiyah by inventing baseless interpretations of the Aayat
and understanding it in a manner contrary to clear import.’
(Fathul Bari vol.9 pg.778; Qadeemi)
Intentional Omission of Tasmiyah
neglectfully or our of Istikhfaaf (regarding it as
insignificant)
The Jurists (Fuqahaa) have
unanimously agreed that consumption of an animal slaughtered
by a Muslim with intentional omission of Tasmiya or regarding
such as insignificant is unlawful (Haraam). Imaam Shaaf’ee
(RA) has also concurred with this view. (Jawaahirul Fiqhvol.2
pg.388; Darul Uloom from Kitaabul Umm and Tafseer Mazhari)
Imaam Abu Yusuf
states:
‘The ruling regarding the animal upon which Tasmiyah was
omitted (at the time of slaughter) is not subject to Ijtihaad
(independent deduction of a ruling from Qur’aan and Hadith).
If a judge rules the permissibility of its sale, his ruling
will not be given effect due to it being contrary to consensus
of opinion.’ (Ibid pg.390; Hidaaya)
It should be
noted significantly that the above discussion of
impermissibility is with regard to a Muslim slaughterer not to
speak of a non-Muslim.
In the case of a
Muslim forgetfully omitting the Tasmiyah, the animal will be
permissible for consumption as is the ruling of all the four
Madhaahib based on the Hadith of Nabi (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam), ‘A believer always slaughters upon the
name of Allah, whether he (remembers to) recites it or not.’
(Fathul Bari vol.9 pg.793; Qadeemi)
Animals Slaughtered by Moden Day Jews and Christians
‘The food of Ahlul Kitaab (people of the
book) is lawful for you as is your food for them.’ (Maaidah
5)
Regarding the
word, ‘Ta’aam’ (food), ibn Abbaas, Ibn Umamah, Mujaahid
and others (Radhiallaahu
Anhum) say that it refers to slaughtered animals. This
matter (permissibility of these animals) is unanimously agreed
upon by all scholars since they also hold the belief of the
prohibition of slaughter save in Allah’s name and also due
to the fact that they mention only the name of Allah Ta’ala
upon their animals of slaughter. (Jawaahirul Fiqh vol.2
pg.4040; from Ibn Katheer)
The reason for
permissibility has been explained clearly by Allaamah ibn
Katheer that due to the unity of belief regarding slaughter
between Muslims and the Jews and Christians of that particular
time, Allah Ta’ala had permitted consumption of their
slaughter. The Ulama of the time had based their rulings on
this very same reasoning.
When this unity
of belief came into doubt, many great Sahaaba (Radhiallaahu Anhum) had not hesitated to rule prohibition.
‘With regards
to a Kitaabi, when he omits Tasmiyah (the name of Allah) upon
his slaughter and takes some other name, his slaughter is not
consumable. This is the ruling of Abu Darda, Ubadah bin Saamit
and large faction of the Sahaaba (Radhiallaahu
Anhum).’ (Jawaahirul Fiqh vol.2 pg.407; Darul Uloom –
from Bahrul Muheet)
Regarding the
Christian tribe of Banu Taghlib, Hadhrat Ali (Radhiallaahu Anhu) ruled the following:
‘Hafiz ibn
Jawzi (RA) has narrated with his Sanad (chain of narrators)
from Ali (Radhiallaahu
Anhu), ‘Do not consume the slaughter of the Christians
of Banu Taghlib since they have not held to any more of
Christianity than their drinking of wine.’ (Ibid pg.460 –
from Tafseer Mazhari)
It is a
well-known fact that the majority of present day Christians
and Jews no longer hold to this Aqeedah (belief) regarding
slaughter. They do not hesitate to consume meat slaughtered by
even Pagans and Mushriks (polytheists) and atheists. They have
held to even less of Christianity than the Banu Taghlib. Most
of them are just Christians and Jews by name, ‘atheistic’
in their beliefs and actions. Their abbatoirs employ machine
slaughter wherever possible and do not hesitate to employ
pagans and polytheists, e.g. Chinese, Koreans, etc. to carry
our slaughter.
The Ruling
Based on the above Juridical references,
Qadhi Thanaullah (RA) a renowned Jurist of his time states the
following:
‘The correct
and accepted view according to us is the first one that the
slaughter of the Ahlul Kitaab with intentional omission of
Tasmiyah (taking the name of Allah) or slaughter on some other
name (besides that of Allah) is not consumable, if this fact
is ascertained with certainity or this is the condition
prevailing among them. By this, the prohibition (of the
Sahaaba) from consuming the slaughter of the Christian Arabs
can be easily understood. Likewise, the ruling of Ali (Radhiallaahu
Anhu) (regarding the Banu Taghlib)’ becomes clear. It is
likely that Ali (Radhiallaahu
Anhu) had ascertained that their omission of Tasmiyah upon
slaughter or that they slaughtered upon some other name
(besides Allah). A similar ruling has been issued regarding
the non-Arab Christians that if it is their normal habit to
slaughter without Tasmiyah, their slaughter is not consumable.
Concerning the present day Christians there is no doubt in the
fact that their methods do not fulfil requirements of
Shar’ee slaughter, but they usually cause the death of their
animals by other lethal measures, e.g. machine slaughter, etc.
hence, their slaughter is impermissible.’ (Jawaahirul Fiqh
vol.2 pg.411; from Tafseer Mazhari)
The Correct Understanding of the Hadith of
Bukhari (cited by many people to justify their claims)
“It has been
narrated from Aaisha (Radhiallaahu
Anha) that some persons said to Nabi (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam), ‘People bring to us meat. We know not
whether the name of Allah Ta’ala has been taken (upon its
slaughter) or not? Nabi (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) replied, ‘You people say Bismillah and
eat it.’ Aaisha (Radhiallaahu Anha) says, ‘the people referred to (in this Hadith)
were new Muslims.’ (Bukhari vol.2 pg.828; Deoband)
It is clear that
the slaughterers were Muslims, not disbelievers. This is
further elucidated by Imaam Maalik (RA)’s narration (of the
same Hadith) where the addition of, ‘this was in the
beginning of Islam.’ (Fathul Bari vol.9 pg.792; Qadeemi) is
found.
To believe that
these people were non-Muslims is in fact tantamount to
accusing the noble Sahaaba of Rasulullah (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) of the heinous crime of consuming meat
slaughtered by polytheists which is expressly forbidden in the
Qur’aan:
‘Forbidden to
you is carrion … till … and that slaughtered for other
than Allah.’ (Maaidah 3)
The actual
meaning of this Hadith, as understood by similar narrations is
that one should not entertain unfounded doubts about a Muslim
that he would neglect to mention the name of Allah upon his
slaughter.
‘This is what
is understood by the context of the Hadith since the answer of
Nabi (Sallallaahu Alayhi
Wasallam) to the question was, ‘Say Bismillah and
eat.’ It is as though they (questioners) were told, ‘That
is not your concern, rather what should concern you is to
consume it (wholesomely in the Sunnah manner) by saying
Bismillah before partaking thereof.’ (Fathul Bari vol.9
pg.793; Qadeemi)
Hafiz ibn
Abdul-Barr (RA) has emphasised on this point very clearly:
‘Similarly, the
slaughter of the Bedouin Muslims will be permissible (for
consumption) since they usually know of the Tasmiya (at the
time of slaughter). Ibn Abdul Barr (RA) has concluded, ‘In
this Hadith, it is understood that the slaughter of a Muslim
should be consumed and he should be regarded as having taken
Tasmiyah upon its slaughter (even when one is not certain
about this fact) because with regards to a Muslim, one should
entertain nothing but good thoughts unless concrete evidence
is established to the contrary.’ (Fathul Bari vol.9 pg.793;
Qadeemi)
This import is
borne out by other narrations of this same Hadith as follows:
‘The narration
of Ibn Uyayna (RA) (one of the Huffaaz of Hadith) has the
addition, ‘accept their oaths and eat’, i.e. take their
word for it that they have taken Tasmiyah upon slaughter (and
partake without doubts). (Ibid pg.793)
The narration of
Abu Sa’eed:
Imaam Tabrani has recorded the narration of Abu Sa’eed
though with a difference in wording that he said, ‘accept
their word that they have effected (Shar’ee) slaughter.’
(and consume it without doubt). (Ibid)
The narration of
Imaam Tahawi (RA):
Some of the
Sahaaba (Radhiallaahu
Anhum) questioned Rasulullah (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) that, ‘Some Bedouins bring to us meat,
cheese and fat. We know not the condition of their Islam,
(i.e. they are Muslims but of what calibre, we are
unaware).’ Nabi (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam) replied, ‘Check that which is
prohibited by Allah and abstain therefrom. Whatever Allah
Ta’ala has not discussed, he has concessioned you. Your Rabb
does not forget. Thus, say Bismillah (and partake). (Ibid)
Explaining this
Hadith, Allaamah ibn Teen comments:
Concerning
Tasmiyah upon slaughter carried out by others of which they
are unaware, there is no obligation upon them regarding it.
The (slaughter) will only be held incorrect when such evidence
is established.’ Allah Ta’ala has not made it obligatory
upon any Muslim to be aware of Tasmiya upon the slaughter of
another Muslim, since the slaugher of another Muslim will be
always regarded as correct (accompanied by Tasmiya) unless
evidence is established to the contrary. (Ibid pg.794)
The above should
be sufficient to clarify any doubt in the meaning of the
Hadith of Bukhari.
Importance of Muslim Unity
with regards to Halaal Meat
Shaytaan is ever prepared to bring about
division as this will inevitably lead to the collapse of the
Muslim Ummah. In his untiring efforts, he has overlooked no
sphere of life to cause his mischief even to the extent of
nourishment. Allah Ta’ala has warned us of Shaytaan’s
inroads in this regard as has been explained already. Shaytaan,
possessed of a keen intelligence and discernment knows full
well that once the Muslims cannot interact and mix with one
another due to suspicion in regards to Halaal and Haraam, this
will bring about the much awaited split in the global
community of Islam. To combat this, it is required that
Muslims take courage and band together to solve this problem,
irrespective of colour and race, since the commands of Allah
Ta’ala are universal. Due to this solidarity, the Muslims of
South Africa, although a minority (around 3 – 4 %) have
progressed far ahead in eliminating this problem. With a bit
of extra physical and monetary sacrifice, they have managed to
establish their own abattoirs in different parts of the
country.
If Muslims in
other parts of the world who have, Alhamdulillah, become a
sizeable community were to show such unity and get together,
there is every confidence that the problem would be eliminated
with little difficulty.
To conclude this,
let us ponder upon the following words of Nabi (Sallallaahu
Alayhi Wasallam):
The lawful is
clear and the unlawful is clear. Between these lie matters of
confusion. Regarding these, many are ignorant. Whomsoever
falls into these, falls into the unlawful, like a shepherd
grazing (his flock) upon a sanctuary’s perimeter, very soon
falls into trespass. Beware! Every king posesses a sanctuary
and the sanctuary of Allah Ta’ala are His prohibitions. Take
note! In the body resides a piece of flesh, upon its
reformation is the entire body’s reform. Upon it’s
corruption is the whole body corrupted. Listen! It is the
heart.’ (Arba’een Nawawiy)
Last modified:
May 05, 2009
Related Reading |